The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson

The Invisible Machine Behind Celebrity Stories

• www.mollymcpherson.com • Episode 300

Share episode

The Invisible Machine Behind Celebrity Stories

Overview
In this episode, Molly explores how celebrity stories are crafted and shaped behind the scenes, examining the key players and mechanisms that drive celebrity narratives in media.

Case Studies Discussed

  • Meghan Markle's Brand Relaunch
  • Taylor Swift/Blake Lively Situation
  • Ryan Reynolds & Blake Lively


Additional Resources Mentioned

  • Vanity Fair article "American Hustle" (February 2025 edition)
  • Previous episode (#299) on Taylor Swift distancing from Blake Lively
  • PR Breakdown Substack: prbreakdown.media

Want More Behind the Breakdown?
Follow The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson on Substack for early access to podcast episodes, exclusive member chats, weekly lives, and monthly workshops that go deeper than the mic. It's the insider’s hub for communicators who want strategy with spine—and a little side-eye where it counts.

Follow Molly → @MollyMcPherson
 Subscribe to PR Breakdown on Substack → prbreakdown.media

Need a Keynote Speaker? Drawing from real-world PR battles, Molly delivers the same engaging stories and hard-won crisis insights from the podcast to your live audience. Click here to book Molly for your next meeting.


Follow & Connect with Molly:

© 2025 The PR Breakdown with Molly McPherson

Molly McPherson:

Hey there, welcome to this episode of the PR Breakdown. I'm your host, molly McPherson, and in this episode let's look at the invisible machine, not the PR machine, but how celebrity stories really get made. The inspiration for this episode no surprise came from two people involved in a topic that I've been talking about at length in the podcast and also online and in the press Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, with Ryan Reynolds also having a co-starring role in all of this. I was inspired by this idea of how framing works in the public realm. When people are consuming media, whether it's social media, legacy media, digital media, tabloid journalism, whatever it is these stories are being shaped and framed.

Molly McPherson:

When I was doing a lot of these media interviews about the Blake Lively Justin Baldoni story, I noticed that some journalists were just coming at it from, just give me the facts, but other journalists were approaching it from angles, no doubt, and they were supporting their angles by sources, and I tend to ask a lot of reporters when they're really digging deep, particularly if it's from a legacy media outlet. At this point I want to know where they're coming from, because if I'm commentating on something, I want to know how I'm going to land in the piece. And then when they give me this information, I want to know about the source. Now I'm not going to ask them who the source is in particular, but give me an idea of who they are. I don't need to know who they are, but I want to know who they are, you know, and I want to know does that person have an angle? How did that person get the information? Because sometimes that will kind of change how I approach the story. This idea of what happens behind the scenes for these stories to end up on social media or end up in the press, you know, can be quite interesting If there's any insight that I can give on the whole world of celebrity crisis, celebrity machinations, all of the elements at play are no different than real life Someone who's dated a Ryan Reynolds. You may not know someone who dated Ryan Reynolds. So we all know Alanis Morissette and we love Alanis Morissette, but you know someone who dated a Ryan Reynolds. Do you know what I'm saying? So let's look at the art of the anonymous source, but also three players in every celebrity story.

Molly McPherson:

Now, I mentioned that I had a reach out today by the press and this tabloid wanted to get my opinion about Meghan Markle. Now I was deep into the work today. I was deep into writing a crisis plan. I was watching videos, looking for strategies same thing that I'm talking about right now but in my world, with my client. I replied in a way that I've never replied before to the press.

Molly McPherson:

Yesterday I turned down a morning news national morning news on one of the networks and I thought, wow, look at you, molly McPherson, how far you can come. There is a time that I would drop everything to do that, but I can't. I have to serve at the behest of my clients, but anyway. So when I got the request and they said it was about Meghan Markle, I thought what's up with the Markle? What's going on there? Because isn't the Netflix series coming out in March? She delayed it because of the LA wildfires. Then, of course, I had to go to the Goog and we find out that she rebranded and released it, so released the website. We now have a new name and there was some framing there.

Molly McPherson:

Now, I'll be honest, I didn't plan this episode around Meghan Markle. She just kind of dropped into my lap in terms of timing, which such is in my business, but I happen to have read this article in Vanity Fair. If you haven't read it, I encourage you to read it. If you're interested in PR machinations, the celebrity machine at work, read that article. But it's also just a well-written article by contributing editor Anna Peel, and she used very few first-person sources in this article. Very few people were named in this article, mostly anonymous or deep background or pulled from other publications Harry's book Spare. She got the information wherever she could, but they were not interviewed for this cover story. So this cover story, february 2025 edition, american Hustle five years leaving the monarchy, meghan and Harry are trying their damnedest to just be normal moguls. Well said, well said. But in this article it fits in so nicely with the topic today.

Molly McPherson:

As I mentioned, I was inspired by this topic a while ago, which is very similar to the Meghan Markle framing narrative. I'll come back to that in a moment, working with the press on this Blake Lively I'm not even going to call it the Blake Lively-Jessabelle Dilling story, because it's really the Blake Lively-Ryan Reynolds story story, because it's really the Blake Lively Ryan Reynolds story. But there's so much framing going on with sources involved in a story. I want to explore the art of the anonymous source. In my previous podcast episode I discussed the Taylor Swift, blake Lively situation, how TMZ dropped a story Thursday afternoon news dump Not a Friday afternoon news dump, but close because it was Super Bowl weekend.

Molly McPherson:

So it kind of counts. They were dropping it at a time when the press wasn't really paying attention Doesn't mean that the press wouldn't see it. But over the weekend they're not working, newsrooms aren't fully staffed and it was Super Bowl weekend. It's no different than Joe Jonas announcing his divorce over Labor Day weekend. So Blake Lively announcing the civil complaint filing it on a Friday, the New York Times story drops on that Friday. Or is it Thursday, friday, saturday? I did my first post about it on Saturday, post about it on Saturday and that story with the New York Times was strategic to be timed with Blake Lively's civil complaint, which was also timed around the holidays it was days before Christmas. Strategic 100%.

Molly McPherson:

And in order to do those types of things or to at least get the press out or people talking about it is you need sources. You can't just drop something. If a story drops in the middle of a forest, is anyone really there to hear it or see it? Was it real? But in the Taylor Swift case, if you listen to the previous podcast, episode 299, I said because TMZ quoted a well-connected source close to Taylor Swift. You know that. That is someone who is a part of the players in every celebrity's story and I want to highlight I'm going to highlight three players and I'm going to tell you how that Taylor Swift story falls into it, but I'm also going to share how Meghan Markle and Harry fall into it as well. All right, so let's look at the three players in every celebrity story.

Molly McPherson:

The first group we're going to call them the gatekeepers. These are the publicists, the managers, the legal teams who control access. Those are the people who are deciding which journalist gets the story, which media outlet gets the exclusive. Who are we going to share this denial to? Who are we going to drop that? Our client is strategically distancing themselves from Blake Lively and we're going to do this in between the Grammy Awards, where their client was nominated for, I think, six Grammy nominations but six and that outcome shifted the narrative. You know how they were going to respond to it, but there's no doubt they planned to drop that story late in the week leading up to the Super Bowl, because the narrative was going to be about Taylor and Travis. We were going to be overwhelmed with that narrative, but the narrative shifted when the Kansas City Chiefs lost that game.

Molly McPherson:

But that is considered a gatekeeper. It is someone who is controlling information. They are opening the doors to the information by delivering it to the press or they are closing it. Think of them as like traffic controllers of celebrity information and a narrative. Now, sometimes what people don't realize, when they see a lot of these spontaneous drops, paparazzi shots or leaked stories, all of a sudden people are everybody's talking about something all of a sudden that usually is something that is orchestrated, sometimes carefully orchestrated, sometimes sloppily orchestrated.

Molly McPherson:

Gatekeepers can keep a story under control and there are many examples where gatekeepers have done that and there are examples where gatekeepers have lost control of the story. Story Examples of gatekeepers who've controlled the story Again Tree Payne, the publicist to Taylor Swift, 100% controlled the Blake Lively distancing story with precision, with precision down to the timing and squeezing it right in between two big publicity events for her client, because Tree Payne likely knew that Taylor Swift, her client, was going to get a lot of publicity and she also knew that the Blake Lively story was going to get very, very messy and it was going to get very, very legal and she did not want her client to be entangled in it. It wasn't just a reputation challenge, it was also a legal one, because you never know who gets served in these cases or what gets revealed. If you want more information about that, check out my previous episode. But that's an example of a gatekeeper that worked. Another example of a gatekeeper situation that worked still an adjacent to Taylor Swift was within sometime last year I think maybe it was in the summer when all of a sudden, big news drop Taylor Swift, travis Kelsey breakup crisis plan found on the desk of a staffer. It first gets dropped in Reddit and then it goes like wildfire. Now I jumped in and talked about how that crisis plan was real. However, I didn't say what the plan was about was real, but the crisis plan itself, because it was part of a strategic plan.

Molly McPherson:

I contend that it was a trial from Travis Kelsey's publicist. His publicists are very wired into the Hollywood messy fixer digital culture. Their client is primarily made up of celebrities, slash influencers, people who make news online. That, to me, had all of the markings of something that came from Travis Kelsey's team. I think it was a trial balloon to find out what would happen in case they broke up Now. Does it mean that they're going to break up? Not necessarily, but any good publicist wants to know what's going to happen Because when Travis and to break up not necessarily, but any good publicist wants to know what's going to happen, because when Travis and Taylor break up at some point, I just don't think they're right for each other Doesn't mean that it's not real. Also means there is a mutual beneficial relationship there as well. So there is PR involved. If they break out, it's going to be a very, very big deal and the threat of Swifties taking sides and absolutely destroying Travis Kelsey is real. And you don't just destroy Travis Kelsey. You could destroy the brand Kelsey, mama, kelsey, jason Kelsey, the Kelsey with the number one podcast, kylie Kelsey. The whole Kelsey machine is a whole different machine. A good publicist is going to want to know what's going to happen. So that's why I think that was gatekeeping at work.

Molly McPherson:

So gatekeeping is from people who are insiders. An example where it didn't work Lizzo. We're two years out of Lizzo's reputation spiral. She still has not recovered. Does she still have a career? Well, yeah, I mean, you still see her. She pops up on social media. She'll pop up here, pop up there, but she is not the brand she used to be. She was a powerhouse brand. People looked at her aspirationally. She was here but that crisis dropped her. Why? Because her gatekeeper did her dirty Her lawyer, marty Singer, longtime fixer, longtime gatekeeper for a lot of celebrities, bill Cosby, charlie Sheen you get the idea he's used to being the fixer.

Molly McPherson:

He can say to a media outlet okay, I'm going to have you drop this story because I'm going to give you this story. He knew how to broker that. But what I contended is that he does not understand a media market and reputation marketplace where the public has so much sway over a celebrity's reputation. I think he severely overplayed his hand and his client lost out. So the first player is the gatekeeper. The second player is going to be the messenger. Now the messengers are the ones who are active players in the game. Now journalists aren't just passive receivers of information. The good journalists build relationships over the years. The good publicists build relationships over the year. They trade smaller stories for bigger scoops while maintaining trust, chasing headlines. But true messengers really know how to kind of move and broker that For people who work in PR.

Molly McPherson:

When you represent a company or an organization, you're always pitching your beat reporters, the same reporters. You're always giving them story ideas. They may not pick up on those stories, but the more that you pitch them, the more you become trusted. And there's so many people in my industry who do not like to pitch stories. I remember when I was hiring a manager, when I was a director of comms, and I asked every single candidate give me the thing that you love to do the most in this job and what do you hate the most? And they all said media relations. They hated talking to the press. The person who I ended up hiring is a person who said that they love talking to the press and I said you, my friend, the outlier, you got this job Because it can be interesting. I mean, that's how you build trust and that's also your currency. How many journalists you know you want to have that trust? Because sometimes you're really going to need them and sometimes they really need you. So messengers are the ones who can drop. So if you want to think of messenger, think of currency. I'm going to give you this as currency, like trust currency. A great example, too, for Messengers People Magazine During the premiere weekend, for it Ends With Us and Deadpool and Wolverine, people Magazine. Oh my gosh, that was like direct messengers, going back and forth because everything out of Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds, as they were trying to react to all this bad publicity, they kept going, going, going to People Magazine where everybody else started reporting on it. So that's a case of the messengers.

Molly McPherson:

Now the third one is going to be the inside circle, and this is where things get interesting, because every single celebrity has an ecosystem around them. They have assistants, they have hairdressers, they have workout trainers, they have people who deliver them juice. I mean, you've seen all the television programs. Some of you probably even know who a lot of the people are. I had a number of Swifties on my live last week and they know everyone. She went to high school with all her friends. You know her bodyguard.

Molly McPherson:

But the insider circle, their currency is proximity. That proximity is going to give you a lot of insight and a lot of intel. The inside circle is usually there to support the celebrity or the politician whomever I'm saying celebrity, but it really could be anyone in the public eye but they're there oftentimes to protect, not to leak, to be a trusted source and a trusted person to that person at the center of it, but sometimes they can also be a source. Now they can drop positive information about their celebrity and negative information about someone else, but they can also drop negative stuff about the people they work for as well. So sometimes you never know the people closest to you.

Molly McPherson:

When I think of an insider circle, I go back two years ago, two summers ago. Labor Day weekend, another Friday afternoon news dump Joe Jonas, when he was divorcing Sophie Turner. His insider circle was working overtime and I know this firsthand from working with people who are getting drops from the Jonas family. That's the inside circle. They were trying to push the narrative that it was a Sophie Turner problem and not a Joe Jonas problem and if you paid attention to content news history you know that did not work well at all for Joe Jonas.

Molly McPherson:

That was a time where I really started to look deeper at blind gossip and how it is used as a strategic PR. And so many times blind gossip comes from gatekeepers and so many times lying gossip comes from gatekeepers, messengers and the inside circle. When you think about information, also think about the economics of information. Think at a time before social media, when publications were always vying for photographs. I listened to the story of Lisa Marie Presley's book that came out a posthumous book read by recordings from her and her daughter, riley Keough. So good, but she was discussing the craziness, the frenzy around photo rights for her daughter, riley and how the paparazzi were going crazy trying to get photographs. If you were around during the time of Princess Diana and I'm coming back to Harry and Meghan back at that time the paparazzi swarming around Princess Diana but also her inside circle dropping stories Prince Charles' inside circle dropping stories that currency is proximity, but sometimes currency is currency and it's money.

Molly McPherson:

So news outlets, media sources higher up the journalistic ethic chain they don't want to pay for news. They don't. They'll say they don't want to pay for news, but they can find money. The money could come in a location shoot, it could come for some other expense, but you still might get compensated for information, and information usually comes in the form of leaked intel and gossip and photos or timing, telling people when someone's going to show up, whatever. If you watch the Crown, for instance, you can see how the economics of information works and how invisible behind the scenes machine of celebrity works as well.

Molly McPherson:

Now, I mentioned in the beginning that I received a call about Meghan Markle. So the article that was in Vanity Fair how it ties into this episode is it is filled with no surprise sources, sources. This entire article written by contributing editor Anna Peel, illustration by Kim Thompson does not have very many firsthand sources and the only firsthand sources that they have are people who are somewhat distant. They were only working in the production arm when they were working with Spotify. It's people who weren't in their inner circle, who are, like, tightly bound by NDAs. Some people spoke anonymously. Some people spoke on background, deep background. A number of people had NDAs.

Molly McPherson:

But this story is interesting because so much of it. What makes it juicy is not when she quotes something from Spare, the 2023 memoir about Harry. It's when she speaks to people who work with them. For example, one of the people who spoke with Vanity Fair for this story said they signed a non-disclosure agreement to be employed by Harry and Meghan. A person who worked closely with the couple and loves them says I have no idea what Harry's interests are beyond polo. No clue what his inner life is like. That's really interesting, like that's a really interesting source.

Molly McPherson:

It adds color to the story because they're getting to what people want the most, which is also one of the reasons why Harry and Meghan are struggling so hard to really get grounded in who they are. They're always on such shaky ground because they spent too much time leveraging the victimization of their situation while demanding privacy. And the problem with that well one. They're counter to each other story, there's no doubt. But what people want is behind the scenes. They want to know what's going on. They want to know how things work, how things move. They want to know power players and why people are power players, why they're supported by some false facades Like give us the inside scoop. That's what people want, but Meghan and Harry are stuck in this place where they really can't expose everything that happened in the royal family. So how do you expose how things happen? Well, you have sources. So the royal family is doing the same thing.

Molly McPherson:

There's so much negative commentary out there about Harry and Meghan. So much of it comes from gatekeepers and messengers and inside circle people, and you could say the same thing about Harry and Meghan. Now, before I dive into this and the Meghan reveal today, I have to do a disclaimer. When I replied to the reporter, I said something that I meant and I've never replied to a reporter like this, ever. But I appreciated the reach out, but I declined to do the story because I said I had no interest in offering commentary about Meghan Markle, because I don't even though I'm doing it right now, but I'm talking about her dropping her brand.

Molly McPherson:

I'll say I don't have a bias against either one of them. I am right down the middle with them. On the one hand, I think Harry did have a very, very different type of lifestyle, growing up very sheltered in the royal family, but also probably not the easiest way to grow up Absolute trauma with his mother. I believe 100% that Meghan Markle experienced racism from the royal family being over in the UK, that she had a lot of struggles there and there's probably a lot of inside things happening in the royal family that that really um created challenges, uh, for her to fully embrace that role. On the other hand, I also think megan and harry have made their transition from the royal family just to mogul status as so complicated and so difficult because they're thinking more emotionally rather than strategically. They jump the gun constantly and their timing it's not just bad strategy, it's bad timing and a lot of it is in their control. A lot of it's not in their control. Remember, they did all this during the pandemic. That's when they went to Canada. I cannot imagine how miserable they were.

Molly McPherson:

You're not going to hear me complain that, meghan Markle. I think she's a narcissistic jerk and I'm not going to be one of those haters. I just think they both really have just a horrible sense of timing because they haven't figured it out yet. But they do have so many champions I mean, they do have so many people who are rooting for them, and I for one am going to watch Megan's show on Netflix and follow her new website. So her new website was dropped today. I only knew this because of the media requests and I didn't even know. They didn't tell me what it was about.

Molly McPherson:

Megan drops the rebrand as ever. Personally, that name ew Because all I think of when I hear as ever is as if. As ever isn't like a complete sentence. It's an idea, it's an opinion about something, but we don't know what something is. But she's using it in the form of as ever, as it's always been. So the website is active right now. You can't go to asevercom. It goes to asevercom slash password. They may not have the domain? I don't know, but all you can do right now is sign up for it.

Molly McPherson:

I also think it's interesting. This is where Harry and Meghan. It's just frustrating from a reputation point of view because they want privacy, they're shielding the kids, they don't want to put their kids out there. But then Lilibet is on her homepage that she's rebranding Granted, she's far away and we're not seeing the face want to push this brand as one that she's rushing out the door because everything they do has been a rush job. But she had no choice because she could not get the trademark. I don't think we'll ever hear accountability from Meghan Markle for why she switched the brand. It's interesting how she's framing this and I'm going to read it and I think you'll be able to pick it up. Now we have People Magazine. Nothing is firsthand. Do I think that Harry and Meghan's team sent a messenger or a gatekeeper to People Magazine with this story? I would say most certainly so, because the headline here, Princess Little Bit makes her debut on as Ever website, a new photo with mom Meghan Markle, and then we have her Instagram where she's announcing the rebrand embedded in the story.

Molly McPherson:

Then we get into the more stickier part of the story, which is well, the rebrand. Why do you have the rebrand? Even people who are not trademark experts know that she struggled with this. She jumped the gun and put out the brand without having the full rights to do that. Here is how she framed it from her video American Riviera that sounds like such a great name. It's my neighborhood, it's a nickname for Santa Barbara, which was the problem, but it limited me to things that were just manufactured and grown in this area. She said in this Instagram video that's framing, you can do whatever you want. No one ever thought, really even though that was the brand it was American Riviera Orchard, really, even though that was the brand it was American Riviera Orchard that she was only going to talk about things out of Santa Barbara or Montecito. No, not at all. Everybody knows.

Molly McPherson:

But she's framing it in a way where you're led to believe that she was sitting there thinking you know, I want to expand, I maybe should do a quick rebrand Even though her television program was supposed to come out and was delayed due to the LA wildfires. So what I think she did, she took the opportunity. I think that LA wildfires were an incredibly convenient excuse for her to delay coming out because that gave her side, her team, time to rebrand, because they could not get that trademark to go through. So then she says I'll continue on quote. Then Netflix came on, not just as my partner in the show, but as my partner in my business, which was huge, I should say. So I thought about it and I've been waiting for a moment to share a name that I okay. So here's like deep, deep framing here that I had secured in 2022. She's putting a timestamp on it. Remember, whenever timing is involved in any type of messaging or crisis, it's strategic. And this is the moment. I do not believe for a moment that since 2022, the name was going to be as ever. Now could that have been a part of a batch of names that she had up on the wall and they secured all of them, sure, sure, but they were going after the Duchess, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex brand and they couldn't even do that brand because it interfered with the royal family protocol. This is a moment and it's called as ever.

Molly McPherson:

Now she can talk about what it means. As Ever essentially means as it's always been, and if you've followed me since 2014 with the Tig, you know I've always loved cooking and crafting and gardening. True, this is what I do, which I buy. It's a part of her whole thing. I followed the Tig. She's very good at being an influencer. She shared and I haven't been able to share it with you in the same way for the past few years understandable, but now I can.

Molly McPherson:

So, as things are starting to trickle out there by your gatekeepers and messengers and inside circle I wanted you to hear it from me first, so that was from Instagram, but you're going to hear it from her team beyond that. So there's going to be a lot of drops and it's going to be interesting to see how they do press, because in this Vanity Fair piece, for example, I mean, this was not an article that they want, because it is not a flattering article about them as well. As a matter of fact, before I go, I have to read one quote in here that I loved Love, love, love, love, love. Because. So this whole story is just filled with little tidbits of drops by, you know, insiders, messengers, gatekeepers but one piece discusses the narrative about Meghan Markle being challenging when she was with the royal family, with her staff, how she yelled and screamed at the staff. So you remember all the stories out there about that. And one thing that I always wondered. It didn't really jibe with me because she's never given someone who screams big energy, screaming energy, chaotic energy. Every time you see her she's this. That mood may shift but she's always been kind of like a calm type B person, at least the persona, but you don't get this kind of idea of screaming.

Molly McPherson:

But they quoted a person who worked in media projects. This is someone somewhat adjacent, so in the Spotify kind of gimlet media archetype realm, when they were trying to get their podcasts off the ground. They said this person who worked in media projects read stories in the tabloids about Meghan bullying palace aides and couldn't imagine such behavior actually happened. Kind of in the same camp. Maybe they didn't like her, but I wasn't buying the bullying piece. After working with her, though, this person realized quote oh, any given Tuesday this happened. End quote While the beggars believed that Meghan actually shouted at a palace aide, as has been reported, a person who interacted with her professionally says quote you can be yelled at even if somebody doesn't raise their voice.

Molly McPherson:

It's funny that people don't differentiate between the energy of being yelled at and literally someone screaming at you and quote. I love that because that is so true, which makes the story of Meghan Markle bullying palace aides believable. Incredible because it wasn't yelling and screaming, but it was this kind of standoffish as they call it mean girls type vibe. Also example two sources say a colleague with ties to archetypes that's their podcast took a leave of absence after working on three episodes, then left Gimlet altogether. Now that's two anonymous sources talking about a colleague who isn't even in this story.

Molly McPherson:

The writer, anna Peel, did a good job weaving together a story, but stories like this, when you are a Meghan Markle or a Prince Harry, you can challenge its credibility, and that's why you always hear from people in the center of a crisis. They'll say, oh, it's just a bunch of anonymous sources or a bunch of people online complaining or a bunch of people on the internet complaining about it. But when it comes to the system and how it works, oftentimes, like I said, there's something to it, and even when I was in New York City a couple weeks ago maybe a month ago doing the interview with ABC News, I ended up spending the day there because I had calls so they let me have an office. When I was there, we were talking about well, actually we were talking about Barack Obama, michelle Obama and the stories there, and we were talking about page six stories and different gossip sources. When page six says something, I was like double take, I thought I couldn't believe it.

Molly McPherson:

I saw Bethany Frankel comment that it was genius of Ryan and Blake to show up at SNL. No, I don't think it was genius at all. It showed. No, I don't think it was genius at all. It showed, as I posted on my TikTok, ryan's quippy, sarcastic humor doesn't work anymore, because I've been positing that out there, like is this humor still going to work? And I've said I don't think it will Because people see through it.

Molly McPherson:

I was a little surprised that Tina Fey and Amy Poehler decided to introduce them. I would not have wanted to do that if I were either one of them. I don't know why, just personally I went oh really, really Like if I were with SNL, I would not have done it. I would not have done it because what is at the center of the story? It's supposed to be about sexual harassment. I would not want to be a part of a conversation or a bit where you're making fun of sexual harassment. That's just me. That's just me.

Molly McPherson:

Ryan Reynolds has a lot of power because he has a lot of money. He has a lot of state in different businesses and different ventures and he's a celebrity and he's A-list and he's a part of a power couple, but his stock dropped significantly. He may still have a lot of money, but he does not have the same level of fame that he had before. He's more notorious now. People definitely know who he is, but people don't view him in the same way. He lost a lot of reputational currency. He lost a lot of reputational currency.

Molly McPherson:

I'm fascinated by the power moves that they make, and there's celebrities out there who make great art. I might like them as a fan, either their music, their art, whatever it is. But all these machinations, ooh. I'm there for the learning and if you learn something this week, I encourage you to share this podcast with anyone who loves to dish on the stuff, like we do, whether you are a celebrity connoisseur or you're someone who loves to work in PR, reputation management, or you're just curious about it because I find it fascinating. So why shouldn't you, why shouldn't we all?

Molly McPherson:

I want to encourage you to subscribe to the podcast. Also subscribe to my YouTube, where you will be able to see this video if you're only listening to it. I have weekly lives on there as well. Also, I encourage you to join my sub stack. It's prbreakdownmedia. That will bring you directly to my sub stack where I write about the stories. I'm also going to create other bits of content that are there for the learning about PR and reputation management, but certainly addition about all the things that we see happening online and in the news, because I love nothing better than a good headline. All right, everyone. Thanks so much for listening and watching. That's all for this week. Bye for now.

People on this episode

Head Shot

Molly McPherson

Host

Podcasts we love

Check out these other fine podcasts recommended by us, not an algorithm.